NURS-6051N Week 2: Assignment THE NURSE LEADER AS KNOWLEDGE WORKER

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed.
25 pts
Develop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good
The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair
The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.
NURS-6051N Week 2: Assignment THE NURSE LEADER AS KNOWLEDGE WORKER

10 to >0 pts

Poor
The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing.
15 pts
Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair
The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

24 to >0 pts

Poor
The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
35 pts
PowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 pts
Resources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good
Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor
Presentation includes: 1 or no resources.
10 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

NURS-6051N Week 2: Assignment THE NURSE LEADER AS KNOWLEDGE WORKER

5 pts