LITERATURE REVIEW: THE USE OF CLINICAL SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AND EFFICIENCIES

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent
The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies Assignment.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good
The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair
The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles

13 to >0 pts

Poor
The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing
20 pts
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good
The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described….Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair
The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.

27 to >0 pts

Poor
The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed.
40 pts
· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing.
25 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100